‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Nokia Design Archive (2025)

253 points · 132 comments · pillars

  1. haritha-j · · focus · HN ↗
    I don't think Nokia deserves all this hate. Sure, they made mistakes, but it wasn't entirely unfeasible to assume that the mobile phone market had matured in terms of features, and the next big thing was going to be "phones as fashion statements." When you think about it, prior to the phone, everything people carried on them everyday was some sort of fashion statement. Clothes, glasses, jewllery, watches, handbags, backpacks etc. I think they assumed that the phone was like the watch; peaked functionally, but room to grow in terms of form.
    1. PorciiVorbesc · · focus · HN ↗
      >I don't think Nokia deserves all this hate.

      Where do you see the hate? Everyone seems to have fond memories of Nokia, on the HW, camera and especially their adventurous fashion and industrial design side that's sorely missing these days in the boring smartphone world.

      They didn't fail because it was hated, they failed because Apple and Android beat them fair and square before they could adapt to the new world driven by taking a 30% cut of sales of high-level apps in walled garden apps-store ecosystems, instead of one driven by sales of embedded hardware in plastic cases with no money on app sales.

      1. alightsoul · · focus · HN ↗
        Nokia didn't adapt because of cost cutting. Their engineers wanted to get into smartphones asap. Android could have died at the hands of Symbian which phone manufacturers preferred, but it was led by nokia and it was fragile
        1. izacus · · focus · HN ↗
          I dunno, I was a mobile developer at that time and moved from Symbian to Android/iOS and I didn't have a feeling Nokia engineering leads had any idea what they're doing either.

          They tried to persuade us to use Qt to write apps (as alternative to iOS)... and they haven't shipped a single phone with Qt available as toolkit. They told us they might ship an update for N95 and perhaps one other model to pre install the library. At the time when they had literally hundreds of models.

          When we finally put an app on their store, they failed to approve it in 6 months (!). Apparently because we chose the whole Europe as launch target so each country's Nokia office had to approve it separately. Silly us.

          Afterwards we moved to Android (1.5, with 1.6 coming) and iPhoneOS.

          1. saidinesh5 · · focus · HN ↗
            Their Qt story was mostly geared towards their Linux phones. N900, N9 were the last of the kind. They killed the N9 before even it was launched. (The infamous Burning platform memo).

            At that time, I genuinely believed that the N9 had the vision and design to beat anything Android was - at that time. Till date, it's still the best UX i experienced in a phone. Even a lot of Nokia managers I talked to called Elop a trojan horse from Microsoft.

            But given how Android's source was open while Meego was anything but.. along with the whole Nokia + Microsoft drama... It's just a shame

            1. izacus · · focus · HN ↗
              The problem was, they had no non-Qt strategy. Symbian was dying and horribly fragmented and they didn't really have anything else.

              (We ended up shipping a webapp which was another kind of disaster on their phones).

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.