Thread

1. ElProlactin · 1790239566 · focus · HN ↗

   This hypocrisy is not at all surprising. The modus operandi for these people has been rules for thee, but not for me for quite a while now.

   1. Almondsetat · 1790240173 · focus · HN ↗

      Feel free to point out the hypochrisy. I'll remind you that sharing a video you took of someone without their consent is not the same as recording them and keeping the video strictly for yourself

      1. GuinansEyebrows · 1790263973 · focus · HN ↗

         neither of these things are remotely acceptable. the degree of distinction is relevant to the impact on the victim and in a punitive sense, but doing either of these things is a mark of a severely antisocial behavior disorder that needs to be addressed by mental healthcare and prevention of access to tools that facilitate this behavior.

         1. Almondsetat · 1790264157 · focus · HN ↗

            Feel free to cite scientific studies proving your unhinged claim

            1. GuinansEyebrows · 1790264796 · focus · HN ↗

               wild choice to double down on focusing on the degree of difference in what one does with footage obtained from filming people without their consent!

               1. Almondsetat · 1790265460 · focus · HN ↗

                  Yes, because there are plenty of situations where it's morally and legally acceptable to film someone without their consent

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.