‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Meta takes down a critical video about meta AI Glasses after filming at Meta

632 points · 395 comments · pieterr

  1. ElProlactin · · focus · HN ↗
    This hypocrisy is not at all surprising. The modus operandi for these people has been rules for thee, but not for me for quite a while now.
    1. Almondsetat · · focus · HN ↗
      Feel free to point out the hypochrisy. I'll remind you that sharing a video you took of someone without their consent is not the same as recording them and keeping the video strictly for yourself
      1. ElProlactin · · focus · HN ↗
        This person was not trespassing on Meta property and nothing indicates that he was harassing employees who refused to be interviewed. It is perfectly legal in the Netherlands to record people in public places.

        You don't need someone's consent to record in public, and if any of the employees objected to the publication of the recording, they could consult with an attorney about a portrait rights claim. Such a claim should be adjudicated by a court, not Facebook.

        And let's be clear about the context here: these types of glasses are used by "content creators" to do street interviews that are published online, and they're also used to record all sorts of junk/nonsense ("pranks", pickup artist BS, etc.).

        Meta doesn't seem to have a problem with content recorded with these glasses being posted on its platforms, even when it's objectionable, because it's literally everywhere. The only problem here, obviously, was that he was recording Meta employees.

        1. lionkor · · focus · HN ↗
          It's illegal to record people in public spaces in Germany. Not sure how NL is important here, did I miss something?
          1. ElProlactin · · focus · HN ↗
            It wasn't in Germany, and my understanding is that in Germany, the issue isn't the video, it's the recording of the audio conversation.

            Anyway, still not applicable in the Netherlands.

            1. mgoetzke · · focus · HN ↗
              In Germany it would also be about the video.

              I cant just take a photo of a person or even car on the street and just share it online unless its clear the car or person is not the central point of the photo standing alone.

              Only few exceptions on that

              1. ElProlactin · · focus · HN ↗
                And? This wasn't in Germany.

                But you raise an interesting point: if this would be against the law in Germany, why is Facebook waiting for these glasses to be banned? It never should have made these available in Germany, and should be using technical means to ensure that they cannot function inside of Germany's borders.

                So it's just more proof of the hypocrisy. Meta doesn't care about the privacy of the plebs.

                1. sandos · · focus · HN ↗
                  Are these constantly filming without user control? How about regular cameras, just ban them?
              2. jeltz · · focus · HN ↗
                This did not happen in Germany! If my grandmother was a bike she would have two wheels.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.