Thread

1. alex-moon · 1790232383 · focus · HN ↗

   It's said on every one of these but it bears repeating: existing cybercrime legislation already covers this - "rogue agent AI associated with OpenAI attempted to hack xyz" = OpenAI attempted to hack xyz.

   1. setopt · 1790232947 · focus · HN ↗

      Shouldn’t the difference be like manslaughter vs murder, in that intent matters? Accidental hacking on this scale is a somewhat new problem, no?

      1. Zarathustra30 · 1790233704 · focus · HN ↗

         I'd say this would be Depraved Heart Hacking. Technically, OpenAi didn't intend for their agent to hack anyone, but it's the obvious consequence of what they are doing.

         <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Depraved-heart_murder" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Depraved-heart_murder

         1. card_zero · 1790238096 · focus · HN ↗

            Huh, a name for when you intend to probably do the thing.

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.