Instinctive is a good way to describe it compared to generative LLMs. Jev gives you one instant answer, fast and usually correct but without nuance or any explanation. Human instincts work the same way.
You're describing external aspects but to me, "instinct" says much more about internal processes than the properties you mentioned, and I haven't seen anything that tells me how these models draw on anything similar to these internal processes to generate their outputs (at least not more than generic LLMs do)
fxwin · · focus · HN ↗
TeMPOraL · · focus · HN ↗
<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thinking,_Fast_and_Slow" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thinking,_Fast_and_Slow
fxwin · · focus · HN ↗
> "System 1" is fast, instinctive and emotional
this implies more than just "fast", which is precisely why i don't like its present usage
tancop · · focus · HN ↗
fxwin · · focus · HN ↗