‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

FLAWED's Flaws and What This Means for Industry Research

24 points · 4 comments · tob_scott_a

  1. Qwuke · · focus · HN ↗
    The &quot;peer review&quot; comment in the original seems particularly bizarre given the errors <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Scholarly_peer_review" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Scholarly_peer_review
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.