‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Meta VR Glasses

496 points · 481 comments · polymorph1sm

  1. JKCalhoun · · focus · HN ↗
    I tried VR and, as many others have said, it's a novelty that wears thin quickly.

    I'm amazed though at the amount of effort and corporate money that keeps being thrown at VR trying to make it a thing.

    It feels like, to the public, it's like some tired The Beverly Hillbillies re-run that keeps popping up from time to time.

    1. colordrops · · focus · HN ↗
      It's a novelty because you had to put on a big uncomfortable headset that required wires up until recently went was really fidgety. Once you get the form factor fixed and comfortable everything will change. This looks like a big step in that direction. Too bad I don't want Meta looking through my eyes.
      1. bigyabai · · focus · HN ↗
        > Once you get the form factor fixed and comfortable everything will change

        Will it? Even if you offer people AR glasses and smartphones at the same price, I'd expect most people to pick the phone. Nobody wants to tap their glasses on a Square reader to buy coffee, or ask their specs to take a picture.

        The VR/AR modality struggles when OEMs rely on unique native experiences as a selling point. There's no "killer app" for VR a even decade after the original Oculus DTK. Palmer Luckey sold Oculus to go work on building cruise missiles, to give you an idea of how awful VR's prospects are.

        1. sublinear · · focus · HN ↗
          > Palmer Luckey sold Oculus to go work on building cruise missiles, to give you an idea of how awful VR's prospects are.

          I too once abandoned a bowl of cereal for a steak dinner, but that says nothing about the quality of the cereal.

          1. bigyabai · · focus · HN ↗
            Luckey owned a cereal bar. He sold it to Zuck, who spent $46 billion and a business rebrand trying to make breakfast compete with dinner.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.