Youtube video Meta released: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xyD_bmMy5nQ" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xyD_bmMy5nQ
And another random youtube influencer who tried it <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8J8oIs1GA0o" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8J8oIs1GA0o
According to the influencer, the weight is 100 g. I have 25 g (+lenses) glasses I wear often, and even that is right on the upper edge of what's comfortable and needs almost-uncomfortable tight arms to stay steady when my head moves. And, that's all as somebody who's worn glasses all my waking hours since like age 10, complete with nose-indent calluses. Either those Meta glasses are clamping uncomfortably hard on the sides of your head all the time or they'll fall off the first time you lean forward.
Is it just me or do those angles deliberately obscure how thick it is lens-wise? I have a pair of X-real airs, 2 years old now, and they're pretty thick. They're 1/4th the price and basically work as a head-mounted display. Is that what this, but way fancier and more sleek?
Xreal style glasses use forms of "birdbath" optics with screens up top reflected through prisms. This likely use the regular concentric pancake optics used in many other VR headsets.
But yeah, the angles are to obscure thickness. It's not going to be as thin as it appear from a distance.
> Youtube video Meta released: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xyD_bmMy5nQ" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xyD_bmMy5nQ
That video is on the page itself as well, right top
dmix · · focus · HN ↗
And another random youtube influencer who tried it <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8J8oIs1GA0o" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8J8oIs1GA0o
$1300 price
[deleted] · · focus · HN ↗
[deleted]
[deleted] · · focus · HN ↗
[deleted]
crooked-v · · focus · HN ↗
scun · · focus · HN ↗
breakpointalpha · · focus · HN ↗
cubefox · · focus · HN ↗
LorenDB · · focus · HN ↗
cubefox · · focus · HN ↗
dmondok · · focus · HN ↗
cubefox · · focus · HN ↗
bookofjoe · · focus · HN ↗
titzer · · focus · HN ↗
numpad0 · · focus · HN ↗
But yeah, the angles are to obscure thickness. It's not going to be as thin as it appear from a distance.
HelloUsername · · focus · HN ↗
That video is on the page itself as well, right top