‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Toyota is taking the Corolla electric

446 points · 838 comments · cisc

  1. freetime2 · · focus · HN ↗
    Cars that are designed from the ground up to be EVs tend to be much better than trying to shoehorn an EV into an ICE design.

    The new Lexus ES350e, which comes in both hybrid and EV flavors, has been pretty universally panned as a mediocre EV [1]. Lexus anticipates that the vast majority of ES sales will be for the hybrid model, and I expect the same will be true of the Corolla.

    The updated bZ and new bZ Woodland on the other hand, which are built as ground-up EVs on the e-TNGA platform, actually seem pretty decent. And I'm hopeful for the upcoming EV Highlander, too (although that will use a modified version of the TNGA-K platform).

    I would prefer if Toyota just released a new EV model with roughly the same proportions as the Corolla, instead of going with the one-size-fits-all approach. But maybe they'll finally be able to get it right this time.

    [1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=QQ97R1nhq4M" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=QQ97R1nhq4M

    1. thelastgallon · · focus · HN ↗
      &gt; I would prefer if Toyota just released a new EV model with roughly the same proportions as the Corolla

      Indeed. Toyota&#x27;s days are numbered.

      BYD is selling EVs for US$14K in Australia. Toyota is Nokia, they don&#x27;t know it just yet. Corolla EV is 30K USD, gas 25K.

      AUD 19,900 driveway (means taxes, registration etc included), or about US$14K: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=49772728">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=49772728

      1. numpad0 · · focus · HN ↗
        Everyone thought Toyota was Nokia when Tesla appeared... I think those days are over. Toyota survived that one already with a facelift for Prius.

        BYD Dolphin base in Japan is $19k, the new Racco kei car is $14k. They&#x27;re not doing so well - they just have no selling point. They&#x27;re not even the cheapest of EVs in Japan, let alone the cheapest of all cars for Japan - $19k is literally 4k over the current gen JDM Corolla. I think that is an indication that BYD has no secret sauce but their pricing are just introductory one to starve off last bits of Western industrial capacities spared by Japanese automakers.

        1. paimapi · · focus · HN ↗
          Teslas started out at 40k USD in mid-2010s money promising more affordable options that we&#x27;re still waiting on (even companies like Slate will probably eat them up when they&#x27;re able to ramp and gain a fanbase)

          Chinese manufacturers are starting far below even the base of contemporary economy ICEs, this is another game entirely

          one of the biggest reasons why they haven&#x27;t taken over the US is because our infrastructure is decades behind. for most people to get a fast charge at home means they either need a new house or an electrical upgrade whereas chargers are everywhere in Chinese cities (even fast battery swap shops). given how balkanized transport authorities are (State&#x27;s rights-to-not-work-together being in effect here) I suspect EV growth will mostly happen in urban centers willing to spend a little extra money on electrification rather than outfitting their police departments with milspec armored trucks

          1. LarsDu88 · · focus · HN ↗
            Tesla promised a 35k Model 3 in 2016.

            Entering that into a CPI inflation calculator, that is $50k in 2026 dollars due to inflation.

            A Model 3 today starts at $38, which is WELL BELOW the 2016 promise. Corrected for inflation, that&#x27;s roughly $28k in 2016 dollars

            They effectively overdelivered on that promise.

            The complaint here, is that Chinese manufacturers, who are mostly in a death battle against each other and not profitable are even cheaper than Tesla and Toyota. In the long run, I suspect that picture will simply not be sustainable for those companies.

            1. Kirby64 · · focus · HN ↗
              &gt; The complaint here, is that Chinese manufacturers, who are mostly in a death battle against each other and not profitable are even cheaper than Tesla and Toyota. In the long run, I suspect that picture will simply not be sustainable for those companies.

              Citation needed. Yes, the many Chinese manufacturers are fighting each other... but I see no reason why they can&#x27;t maintain prices. And I doubt they&#x27;re all unprofitable, especially the big ones like BYD.

              1. LarsDu88 · · focus · HN ↗
                It&#x27;s not a matter of maintaining prices. It&#x27;s what will happen when a winner emerges and the winner naturally raises prices.
                1. paimapi · · focus · HN ↗
                  is this what happens in China&#x27;s market? because my understanding is that China loves having an array of competitors. their entire strategy is just to &#x27;build the stage&#x27; (via infra buildouts, workforce training, etc) for private enterprises to capitalize on which means rich fields for everyone. and the more that compete, the better it is for their economy. it&#x27;s why there&#x27;s something like six large smartphone makers all competing with one another (not counting the myriad smaller makers that exist) - how many large smartphone makers exist in the US?
                  1. jonnycomputer · · focus · HN ↗
                    But the companies are not profitable; their losses are being covered by the Chinese state. The question is whether this is actually an effective strategy long term.
                    1. hbd-investor · · focus · HN ↗
                      The Chinese market is this way because the people that run chinese companies have deep knowledge of actually how to make products, frequently engage in industrial espionage, and are willing do expend tons of effort just to undercut a competitor by 10 cents.

                      The magic is not in am i making a different widget. Its how that widget is made, what are all the machines involved in making that widget. Could i design a machine to make the exact same widget, but with reduced vibrations, 10% less electricity, and reduce maintenance by 10% while still maintaining quality?

                      For example

                      If they see a company making widgets, and this company makes them by using 10 custom engineered machines with a lifetime production run of 5 each, each of these 10 custom made machines needs to be designed by a army of engineers working for years.

                      A competitor in china will do espionage, the CEO&#x27;s and upper management will study these 10 machines in depth, see where they could make improvements and if they see a opportunity like hey machine number 3 , 7 and 10 are designed like X, if we design it like Y we could cut electricity consumption by 10%. This will allow use to undercut their widgets for 10 cents.

                      The people running US corps are all business bros, and the people are lazy, they aren&#x27;t interested in doing years of labor, to make a production line of 10 machines to undercut another billion dollar company for 10 cents.

                      If you go to your local chinatown, the chinese restaurants operate this way always constantly looking to crush their competitors, always trying to improve supply chains, always looking to cut costs and undercut competitors. Looking to cut out middlemen.

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.