‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Toyota is taking the Corolla electric

446 points · 838 comments · cisc

  1. freetime2 · · focus · HN ↗
    Cars that are designed from the ground up to be EVs tend to be much better than trying to shoehorn an EV into an ICE design.

    The new Lexus ES350e, which comes in both hybrid and EV flavors, has been pretty universally panned as a mediocre EV [1]. Lexus anticipates that the vast majority of ES sales will be for the hybrid model, and I expect the same will be true of the Corolla.

    The updated bZ and new bZ Woodland on the other hand, which are built as ground-up EVs on the e-TNGA platform, actually seem pretty decent. And I'm hopeful for the upcoming EV Highlander, too (although that will use a modified version of the TNGA-K platform).

    I would prefer if Toyota just released a new EV model with roughly the same proportions as the Corolla, instead of going with the one-size-fits-all approach. But maybe they'll finally be able to get it right this time.

    [1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=QQ97R1nhq4M" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=QQ97R1nhq4M

    1. hn_submit · · focus · HN ↗
      I agree that it&#x27;s much better to design an EV to be an EV from the ground up. The reality is, however, that consumers don&#x27;t want EVs for a myriad of reasons and prefer hybrids. And developing two completely different platforms is too expensive even for a higly profitable company like Toyota.
      1. RussianCow · · focus · HN ↗
        Seems like a chicken-and-egg problem. Part of the reason consumers don&#x27;t want EVs is because there are limited options that are any good.
        1. Brendinooo · · focus · HN ↗
          For me it&#x27;s cost. I&#x27;d have to sink a couple of grand into getting my home electric up to speed most likely, and then I&#x27;ll be paying a bunch of extra money to get the car. Turns into a math problem about paying for electric now or gas over the next n years and electric usually breaks even or loses.
          1. russelg · · focus · HN ↗
            Trickle charging overnight on standard AC is more than enough for a standard commuter, of course YMMV ;)
            1. taneq · · focus · HN ↗
              Depends whether they have access to 230V power. I’d want at least a 3.5kW charger, charging at half that would be miserable.
              1. fennecbutt · · focus · HN ↗
                3.5kw*12=42kwh. That&#x27;s like half the capacity of a fairly decent range EV.

                How many people are really driving 240~ miles per day? Practically nobody...that&#x27;s like 3.5 hours at motorway speeds.

                Inb4 the typical response of &quot;every American commutes 99999 miles per day!!!&quot;

                Charging at 1kw at home would be perfectly fine for average use cases.

                1. BobbyTables2 · · focus · HN ↗
                  Seems like it could get annoying if one wants a full charge but has to plan up to 4 days in advance, compared to a 10 minute gas station run.
                  1. atonse · · focus · HN ↗
                    It sounds like you might not own an EV.

                    The #1 thing (in my opinion) that makes a difference in how easy it is to own an EV is whether you have a driveway or predictable parking spot overnight. Then you just stop thinking about this sort of stuff, ever.

                    In fact, since I got an EV (I have a two-car garage), I have forgotten to even check my gas car&#x27;s fuel levels and have driven it near empty a handful of times, I simply forget to even check.

                    And as others have said, unless you&#x27;re driving 250mi a day, a regular commute, you can recharge your car on a wall outlet. It does about 12 miles of range per hour, you can easily get about 100 miles of range every night.

                    1. anon7725 · · focus · HN ↗
                      &gt; It does about 12 miles of range per hour, you can easily get about 100 miles of range every night.

                      I wonder if the residential 230v standard in many parts of the world contributes to EV adoption. A standard household outlet can do up to 3.5kw on 230v whereas in North America a standard outlet is 15A at 120v which only gives you a max of 1.8kw (realistically more like 1.6kw). To get increased power you need a 240v circuit which is typically only for selected appliances like dryers, induction cooktops, heat pumps, etc.

                      1. cucumber3732842 · · focus · HN ↗
                        &gt;I wonder if the residential 230v standard in many parts of the world contributes to EV adoption.

                        The veracity to which the government enforces rules that make work for variorus electrical professionals and manufactures has a lot more to do with it IMO.

                        In some places an EV charger install is a &quot;here&#x27;s the best we could do, you might trip the main breaker if you fast charge while running the stove and water heater and dryer all at once&quot;

                        In some places it&#x27;s permits and panel upgrades, and, &quot;have to bring X up to code while we&#x27;re at it, that&#x27;ll be &lt;1&#x2F;3 cost of car&gt;&quot;, and, and, and, (to the cheers of the same demographics who complain adoption is to slow no less).

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.