Pricing at $0.25 and $0.75 already puts its cost well above reasonably reputable inference providers for deepseek v4 flash or qwen 3.8-flash-next or similar class of open weight LLMs that fit in under 170GB of RAM, so I don't see the point. I think this is probably also stupider than laguna s 2.1 which can also be very cheap to serve.
Is it possible to construct a control system where bad, fast and cheap can become good, fast, and cheap through repeated sampling and a strong spec/eval harness?
I am trying to keep an open mind with AI, but I also have little understanding of control theory, trying to learn.
You can, but you need to break the problem into much smaller tasks, then check those answers, and finally have a harness that handles all the context, task breakup, task definitions, and validations each round.
walrus01 · · focus · HN ↗
RussianCow · · focus · HN ↗
_aavaa_ · · focus · HN ↗
hermannj314 · · focus · HN ↗
I am trying to keep an open mind with AI, but I also have little understanding of control theory, trying to learn.
calgoo · · focus · HN ↗