‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

White House Says Access Is a 'Privilege' in Court Filing Defending Media Ban

52 points · 43 comments · whack

  1. dataflow · · focus · HN ↗
    I feel like this they're deliberately framing it this way to lay a trap for the courts, because accepting this framing doesn't really seem to leave a whole lot of legal wiggle room. After all, legally speaking, what is it exactly, if not a privilege? If it's a right, then basically any citizen should be allowed in, subject to fair/non-discriminatory constraints, like capacity... is/should that be the case? If it's neither then what is it?
    1. bradleyjg · · focus · HN ↗
      > because accepting this framing doesn't really seem to leave a whole lot of legal wiggle room.

      No, it’s not a problem. The government can’t grant or withdraw a privilege for impermissible reasons.

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.