Thread

1. rvz · 1790202991 · focus · HN ↗

   This entire article is complete AI slop, with the most basic Claudisms present without even needing extensive inspection or needing to use pangram.

   I thought HN would be smart enough to not get easily tricked into upvoting such low quality articles like this, but because it mentions "Claude", it is worthy of some intellectual curiosity.

   Come on, do better.

   EDIT: Of course, unintellectual low quality AI slop posts are allowed on HN. We know that for sure.

   1. harshavamsi · 1790204221 · focus · HN ↗

      straight over the head

      1. rvz · 1790214377 · focus · HN ↗

         …and it was flagged into irrelevance for being pure slop as it should be.

         So since when was such slop submissions allowed?

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.