Thread

1. Chance-Device · 1790200522 · focus · HN ↗

   > He said the agent had accessed files that were publicly available as well as material that was not intended for public access.

   “Not intended”. I’ll bet you whatever this was it wasn’t even secured, it was just hosted somewhere openly.

   1. gitonup · 1790202078 · focus · HN ↗

      Ok, if we're not being at all charitable with the language used by the hosts of the data, let's be equally uncharitable with OpenAI.

      - If "OpenAI" means the company acting on behalf of the company, why were they even looking to do this?

      - If "OpenAI" means they were acting as a proxy for bad actors, what actions do we take to handle that?

      - If "OpenAI" means they were accidentally breaching this system, in what sense does that distinction even matter, in terms of the outcome? If I build a nuke by accident without eng. due diligence, am I legally liable?

      1. [deleted] · 1790710090 · focus · HN ↗

         [deleted]

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.