Thread

1. cdrnsf · 1790200280 · focus · HN ↗

   DoorDash and gig companies generally are a play to destabilize employment and turn as many people as possible from employees entitled to benefits and legal protections into contractors that can be discarded at whim. How is ordering, say, a pizza via DoorDash in any way better for you, as a customer, than ordering from a pizza place that employs drivers?

   1. Sohcahtoa82 · 1790203220 · focus · HN ↗

      > How is ordering, say, a pizza via DoorDash in any way better for you, as a customer, than ordering from a pizza place that employs drivers?

      One word: variety.

      My local sushi place isn't going to have enough delivery orders to justify having delivery drivers on staff.

      Heck, I remember years ago (Was it the late 90s?) when McDonald's tried to do delivery.

      1. cdrnsf · 1790204155 · focus · HN ↗

         I'll concede the point on variety but I don't think the platforms or their terms are fair to restaurants, delivery drivers or perhaps even customers (though they're clearly choosing to engage). Our favorite Mexican food place in town will fill the orders but isn't happy with them and I imagine they're not alone.

         1. kelnos · 1790241744 · focus · HN ↗

            Your original post seems to suggest that DoorDash doesn't actually provide value (that we didn't have before) to customers, but that's trivially false. I think that's the thing people are arguing against.

            But yes, their business practices suck, and that's our fault as a society for yet again allowing capitalism to run amok.

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.