Thread

1. evolarjun · 1790192734 · focus · HN ↗

   It is odd (or maybe not) that they decided to publish a marketing whitepaper rather than a more traditional journal submission + preprint. The work does appear to be sufficient for a publication, though there's a good chance a reviewer will rip into them for some of the assertions they make, but given the topic I'm sure the paper will be accepted regardless.

   The market for entry-level programmers has already declined, but at least they were somewhat in demand and made reasonable salaries. Now what happens to post-docs who already make almost nothing and often get treated like crap?

   1. refulgentis · 1790193487 · focus · HN ↗

      I’m curious, what differentiates this from a preprint given the assumption it’s sufficient for publication? It didn’t read like marketing, they don’t seem to sell anything, and there's a link to a not-anthropic.com hosted paper.

      1. parl_match · 1790193618 · focus · HN ↗

         > they don’t seem to sell anything

         i'll give you a hint: they're selling something

         1. refulgentis · 1790195371 · focus · HN ↗

            Let's say "anything talking about your product is selling something instead of doing science"

            Then we're faced with "why would a (insert whatever differentiates this from a preprint) mean they're not selling something"?

            1. parl_match · 1790641788 · focus · HN ↗

               > Let's say "anything talking about your product is selling something instead of doing science"

               you are gonna be so stunned to find out when more than one thing can be true at the same time

               are they doing science? yes. are they selling something? yes.

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.