‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

UK military jamming other nations' satellites to defend itself, BBC told

171 points · 213 comments · thm

  1. gorgoiler · · focus · HN ↗
    Presumably when World War 3 kicks off the very first thing each adversary will do is knock out their opponents satellites? These are like flying lightbulbs that shine down usefulness from above, so step one is to cut the lights.

    Presumably-squared there is some kind of military backup to survive once the lights (GPS) go dark? Whatever that technology is, why hasn’t it proliferated into civilian life so that we all benefit from a resilient, non-GPS backup?

    Perhaps the answer is that every tank has a 10lb inertial navigation gyro or some other thingy in it as a backup, and the platoon around it uses the tank as a moving trig point? In that case I can see it being infeasible to deploy that for civilians.

    Perhaps-squared it’s just economics — GPS is cool and cheap now, so why burn profit margin on developing an alternative?

    1. nradov · · focus · HN ↗
      Right, in future conflicts between major countries the satellites will be first casualties. The US military is aware of this and still trains personnel on analog navigation techniques. Inertial navigation works well for some missions and research is underway on alternative technologies. Civil airliners can still navigate without GPS, although this may reduce safety and increase workload.

      <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;interestingengineering.com&#x2F;military&#x2F;us-military-nails-gps-free-navigation" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;interestingengineering.com&#x2F;military&#x2F;us-military-nail...

      We&#x27;re also going to need a prompt launch capability to replace attrition losses. There should be warehouses full of spare navigation, reconnaissance, and communications satellites ready to mount on a reusable booster and launch within hours. Concerns have been raised over a &quot;Kessler syndrome&quot; due to orbital debris but in lower orbits with significant atmospheric drag this won&#x27;t be a serious problem.

      1. hollerith · · focus · HN ↗
        George Friedman suggests that the reason Washington is going back to the moon is that it is easier to launch satellites into Earth orbit from the moon than from the Earth&#x27;s surface.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.