‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Italian parliament votes for return to nuclear energy

908 points · 818 comments · geox

  1. adrianN · · focus · HN ↗
    It is sad that this has become a topic of the culture wars. Nothing good comes out of this, certainly not a rational weighing of the pros and cons of nuclear power.

    I’m particularly interested in how they plan to finance reactors in a grid dominated by solar. I wouldn’t be surprised if they legally allow the building of new reactors but then fail to find investors. But perhaps they plan on using them as some sort of strategic assets and will just run them at a loss?

    1. drnick1 · · focus · HN ↗
      > certainly not a rational weighing of the pros and cons of nuclear power.

      Nuclear has no real cons other than time/cost of deployment, and it should be a no brainer for a place like Europe without significant energy resources. Once the power plant is built, it provides 50+ years of nearly free energy. It's that or buying gas from Russia.

      1. _verandaguy · · focus · HN ↗
        Cost of deployment is a massive consideration in our not-yet-post-scarcity society.

        It takes billions to certify a nuclear power plant, and it takes billions more to re-certify it every few decades, to say nothing of the costs of modernization.

        To be clear, I consider myself generally pro-nuclear power, but let's not ignore the massive upfront and ongoing capital and operational costs that really undermine this idea that it's free power.

        1. someonebaggy · · focus · HN ↗
          What if we just skipped the certification?
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.