‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Rails World 2026 Opening Keynote [video]

447 points · 508 comments · an0malous

  1. tnolet · · focus · HN ↗

    [dead]

    1. xdennis · · focus · HN ↗
      Okay, I'll bite. What did he do that's racist and fascist. And please provide receipts.

      For reference, here are the definitions:

      racist: a person who believes that a particular race is superior to others, or who discriminates against other races

      fascism: any right-wing, authoritarian, nationalist ideology characterized by centralized, totalitarian governance, strong regimentation of the economy and society, and repression of criticism or opposition

      1. omnimus · · focus · HN ↗
        Read some of his latest blog posts. Like <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;world.hey.com&#x2F;dhh&#x2F;wolves-sheep-and-gypsies-ba44af6a" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;world.hey.com&#x2F;dhh&#x2F;wolves-sheep-and-gypsies-ba44af6a
        1. TheAlchemist · · focus · HN ↗

          [dead]

          1. rtpg · · focus · HN ↗
            &gt; When wolves get out of control, you shoot them. When gypsies take over public spaces, you deport them. This isn&#x27;t hard, it isn&#x27;t cruel. It&#x27;s the basic logic of self-preservation.

            Think about why he compares gypsies to wolves, and talks about &quot;self-preservation&quot;.

            You might want to be pedantic and try to say he&#x27;s not comparing them to wolves. He is the one who put those two sentences next to each other. You can choose to ignore the thing that feels obvious to others.

            I know a lot of people are decently close to DHH in their feelings on this issue. I think that being publicly loud about these opinions that most people keep to themselves simply leads to wondering what his _actual_ deep opinions are. Think about what you say in private compared to what you say in public, and consider that he is writing in public.

            A sentiment being common or not is a bit besides the point about whether it&#x27;s authoritarian or fascistic or whatever.

            If you remove the context and the implication from his post, you can make the argument that it&#x27;s &quot;just&quot; a post saying &quot;enforce immigration laws&quot;.

            The problem is that the context and the implications are part of his post. He is communicating who he is and what he believes, and for you it&#x27;s mostly a question of whether you&#x27;re going to listen to it.

            This whole line of discussion is had about DHH in particular decently often, and I find it kinda funny because even beyond all of this I&#x27;ve always heard that he&#x27;s just kind of a disagreeable person anyways. But I suppose this industry pulls in a certain kind of annoying person.

            1. sejje · · focus · HN ↗

              [dead]

              1. enraged_camel · · focus · HN ↗
                Because, in the context he is describing, humans hunt and kill the wolves:

                &gt;&gt; There&#x27;s a reason why the last known wolf in Denmark didn&#x27;t just wander off, but was shot dead in 1813.

                &gt;&gt; When wolves get out of control, you shoot them.

                1. sejje · · focus · HN ↗
                  Yeah, but then in the very next sentence, he says what you do with humans. He&#x27;s explicit about it, so we don&#x27;t have to guess.

                  &gt; When wolves get out of control, you shoot them. When gypsies take over public spaces, you deport them.

                  So no, he&#x27;s not talking about hunting and killing the humans.

                  1. preisschild · · focus · HN ↗
                    No hes just talking about denying them human rights, much better.
                    1. sejje · · focus · HN ↗
                      It&#x27;s not &quot;human rights&quot; to get to move into other folks&#x27; countries.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.