Thread

Loading the complete thread in the background. This saved snapshot is available now. Refresh

1. davidee · 1790184619 · focus · HN ↗

   Alt text: Buzz Lighter sees functional programming paradigms everywhere.

   PS - I don't follow JavaScript or use it much, but these are nice tools to have in any language.

2. gavinray · 1790184982 · focus · HN ↗

     > "I think people generally choose Deno because of the stability and security-first architecture."
   

   The appeal of Deno to me was always it's Go-like `std` library, so that building basic apps didn't result in a spaghetti web of dependencies like in Node.
3. _ink_ · 1790190219 · focus · HN ↗

   So is Angular dead? Or why doesn't it deserve any mention?

   1. whythismatters · 1790190463 · focus · HN ↗

      The author mentions Angular in the comments as a personal blind spot
4. giancarlostoro · 1790194103 · focus · HN ↗

   > I get into this in A Nice Vanilla App Architecture Using Web Components and CSS Module Scripts. I just really like how we can keep CSS to CSS files which could live in a folder right next to a JavaScript component.

   I forget when in the mid to late 2010s I started seeing CSS inside JS code for SPA frameworks, but I absolutely hated it, it felt so wrong. Why should I go through so many layers to get my CSS When the browser is efficient about loading CSS as-is. I'm okay with it being "aside" a component on the other hand.

   1. prinny_ · 1790199851 · focus · HN ↗

      > Why should I go through so many layers to get my CSS

      You underestimate the passion with which the average front end developer hates CSS.

5. bra31k · 1791142404 · focus · HN ↗

   [dead]

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.