it's less about the interfaces and more that it feels disingenuous to compare token usage to a pi setup that injects a bunch of stuff into context rather than the base version. it makes me think they tested it with pi, found they couldnt meaningfully beat its token usage + pass rate, and omitted the comparison. i'd love to be proven wrong, but this seems like the easy explanation
Because vanilla pi doesn't do a lot of important things out of the box, and they didn't want to open the "which extensions should we add" can of worms.
fxwin · · focus · HN ↗
chaos_emergent · · focus · HN ↗
c0rruptbytes · · focus · HN ↗
fxwin · · focus · HN ↗
jbellis · · focus · HN ↗
fxwin · · focus · HN ↗