‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Community condemn Bedminster AI mural as 'insult' to artists

37 points · 28 comments · edward

  1. gchamonlive · · focus · HN ↗
    Art isn't supposed to be comfortable and it's uncomfortable for a good reason, what if this became a trend? Would it endanger the organic art scene? Can these coexist?

    That we are discussing it shows that the mural, even though it's AI generated is performing as art should. Should we welcome all forms of art? If not, where do we draw the line? That's for me the most uncomfortable question.

    1. OhMeadhbh · · focus · HN ↗
      "Comfort implies art" is different from "art implies comfort."

      Which is to say, not all art is comfortable, but not all things that are not comfortable are art.

      It's perfectly fine for art to be comfortable. Stop gate-keeping.

      1. gchamonlive · · focus · HN ↗
        I never made this assessment, that's not an interpretation you can derive from my comment in good faith. I just commented that art isn't supposed to be comfortable, nowhere I said that all art is uncomfortable. The mural is however performing just like art. What if this was an original confirmed banksy?
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.