Thread

Loading the complete thread in the background. This saved snapshot is available now. Refresh

1. fuzzumms · 1790174624 · focus · HN ↗

   Interesting way to guarantee some sort of safety for automated decisioning

   1. niyikiza · 1790178317 · focus · HN ↗

      Tenuo guarantees the agent's actions stay within the defined boundaries but it doesn't influence what the agent "thinks" about or what it decides to do within those boundaries
2. dj0_ · 1790174762 · focus · HN ↗

   The task bound idea is interesting. I’m starting to hear more of this theoretically on AI enterprise architecture. Has anyone actually implemented it successfully?
3. luka2233 · 1790174766 · focus · HN ↗

   [dead]

4. ozs · 1790175118 · focus · HN ↗

   Interesting to experiment with. As AI agents get faster and cheaper (and thus more accessible) having good governance around their actions becomes more important to cut down on shadow agents/runaway agentic actions and consequences
5. gyre007 · 1790176985 · focus · HN ↗

   Shockingly vibed blog post. Actually hurt my brain reading this and I had to stop.
6. chstr_9 · 1790179920 · focus · HN ↗

   Haven't seen many attempts to govern agents using task bound authority. Curious to see how this holds up in real world implementation.
7. 0123456789ABCDE · 1790179990 · focus · HN ↗

   [delayed]

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.