‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Seattle City Council votes to ban surveillance pricing in sale of groceries

395 points · 229 comments · ortusdux

  1. flowerlad · · focus · HN ↗
    Why is this limited to groceries? I don't want to pay a different price than others for any category of item, not just groceries.

    Should gyms be able to charge me more based on my weight? Should airlines charge me more because they know I need to travel urgently? Should pharmacies charge me more for medication because they know I have a chronic condition? Should an online retailer charge me more because my browsing history suggests I'm willing to pay a premium? Should insurance companies charge me more because they know I'm unlikely to shop around?

    1. BeetleB · · focus · HN ↗
      If I'm selling to the wealthiest zip code, where the median house price is over $10M, should I be disallowed to charge higher prices? (Not for selling a house, but selling ordinary stuff to them).

      If I'm posting something for sale on Craigslist, and I don't put a price, is it OK if I quote different prices to different people who text me?

      I can see arguments both ways.

      1. colingauvin · · focus · HN ↗
        Not comparable. The markets can still charge wherever they want, but it needs to be priced per item and not per customer. In your house counterexample, you could set whatever list price you want.
        1. BeetleB · · focus · HN ↗
          I updated my comment - it wasn't clear. I wasn't referring to the price of houses, but to the price of goods sold to people living in that zip code.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.