Or, you could have a build system that does a 100% out-of-tree build into ./build, and then if the build is broken you delete that one directory. You hardly need git to help you with that.
Get a new job? You can't be that "in charge of" a repo if you can't enforce rules this basic. In fact, I don't understand how you can enforce something as (being polite) unusual as banning .gitignore and yet can't enforce build system hygiene.
> Or, you could have a build system that does a 100% out-of-tree build
I'm not sure what effect you think properly functioning build scripts in my project(s) are going to have on the broken build systems encountered in other projects. Those broken build systems continue to be broken, despite my projects' build scripts continuing to work as expected. Please advise.
cxr · · focus · HN ↗
[dead]
quietbritishjim · · focus · HN ↗
cxr · · focus · HN ↗
[dead]
quietbritishjim · · focus · HN ↗
cxr · · focus · HN ↗
[deleted] · · focus · HN ↗
[deleted]
cxr · · focus · HN ↗
I'm not sure what effect you think properly functioning build scripts in my project(s) are going to have on the broken build systems encountered in other projects. Those broken build systems continue to be broken, despite my projects' build scripts continuing to work as expected. Please advise.