‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

The Download: why AI's latest breakthroughs and fears may be more hype than rea

49 points · 128 comments · joozio

  1. hn_submit · · focus · HN ↗
    I think the pumped-up hype nicely coincides with some A.I. companies' desire to go public in the coming weeks or months.

    I see lots of fabricated news on the internet concerning LLMs. Like one that claims GPT-6 broke an Enigma enciphered message which has withstood decrypting for almost 80 years. And how this seasoned cryptographer stood in awe. Yeah, right.

    1. 0xDEAFBEAD · · focus · HN ↗
      A good way to check whether it's substance vs hype is to check whether people are paying for it.

      "Anthropic is now pacing to generate more than $100 billion in annual revenue, up 50% from just two months ago, the New York Times reported Friday."

      <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.axios.com&#x2F;2026&#x2F;09&#x2F;18&#x2F;anthropic-100-billion-revenue" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.axios.com&#x2F;2026&#x2F;09&#x2F;18&#x2F;anthropic-100-billion-reven...

      That&#x27;s already more revenue that Disney, Johnson &amp; Johnson, Boeing, or FedEx. And they are growing extremely rapidly.

      1. hn_submit · · focus · HN ↗
        How much of that revenue is investment from other A.I. companies (NVIDIA, Microsoft) being tallied?

        Are companies really spending millions a year on A.I. when software engineers can be had for much less?

        1. 0xDEAFBEAD · · focus · HN ↗
          Why would investment from other AI companies be tallied as revenue?
          1. hn_submit · · focus · HN ↗
            Because accountancy rules don&#x27;t expressly forbid it?
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.