‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

The Download: why AI's latest breakthroughs and fears may be more hype than rea

49 points · 128 comments · joozio

  1. bananaflag · · focus · HN ↗
    > Describing them as “superintelligence” or “rogue models” ascribes agency to products rather than to the companies building them. This framing markets these companies’ products as “superhuman” and, at the same time, helps the companies evade accountability for their actions.

    If someone discovered how to summon demons to aid them in robbing banks the main issue wouldn't be "but who has the responsibility for the crime, the human or the demon", it would be "OMG DEMONS".

    Seriously, I don't get what sort of world these people are living in.

    1. throwawayffffas · · focus · HN ↗
      Your analogy assumes that no one ever has summoned demons before and that the demons would be predisposed to rob banks.

      A closer analogy to what's happening would be someone trains a monkey to steal jewellery and then is shocked when the monkey steals jewellery from their neighbors when they told it to steal from their own shop.

      Clearly all liability falls to the monkey operator and you know the existence of trained monkeys is not that shocking.

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.