‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Jev in 25 Lines of Python

691 points · 212 comments · bashbjorn

  1. bruhhhhhh · · focus · HN ↗
    I am hearing about Jev for the first time here so no idea about the hype. So their(Jev) is that the thing is faster at classification than a frontier model? Because the whole type safe aspect is already fully solvable with structured output. But their example is classification but that would also be possible and faster with a classic BERT model. So their pitch is a task specific smaller model or am I completely misunderstanding the whole thing?
    1. idz · · focus · HN ↗
      > is already fully solvable with structured output.

      Not particularly. There is still the problem of hallucinations and varying results across runs.

      That's more of what type-safety means for their team. Every run gives the same results. It's type-safe

      1. pasteleft · · focus · HN ↗
        Jev HAS hallucinations and it doesn't attempt to solve hallucination at all.

        For three choices problem (A,B,C), what Jev guarantees is that it will give the choice in a defined schema (type-safe). It never guarantees that the choice is correct (hallucination).

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.