US criticises Australia's proposed algorithm opt-out laws as 'censorship'
Thread
Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.
US criticises Australia's proposed algorithm opt-out laws as 'censorship'
Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.
nomilk · · focus · HN ↗
As an Australian who just wants relatively free access to information (and the ability to freely/easily discuss it), it's frustrating.
And it's not the first time the Australian government has done this; last year they banned U16 from social media, several weeks later everyone was alerted to Bondi by... social media.. so they could get the heck out of there, but U16... they were left clueless and unable to get updates (news sites ran 30+ minutes behind real-time events and official sites like NSW Police took 70+ minutes to even announce there was a shooter).
gregoryl · · focus · HN ↗
maximus_01 · · focus · HN ↗
BLKNSLVR · · focus · HN ↗
The Left have always been a bit more 'censory', generally because of their bleeding hearts on behalf of the minorities that are the targets of the Right's exercising of their free speech.
Such is my understanding. I don't really mind either stance, with the caveat that anything 'censory' has a chance of having it's definitions expanded (and admittedly, this is succumbing to the slippery slope fallacy).
acoustics · · focus · HN ↗
> The Left have always been a bit more 'censory'
Not "always", and not even now. It's always contingent and situational. Same goes for nearly every clause in the Bill of Rights.
At various points the left has been associated with the fights against obscenity laws, against Cold War loyalty oaths, against blacklisting, against bans of books.
At various points the right has been associated with the fights against desecration of the American flag, against the teaching of human evolution in schools, against depictions of sex in media, against anti-war demonstrations.
Danox · · focus · HN ↗
[dead]