‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

The current balance of power in open models

132 points · 58 comments · gmays

  1. Zaraif13 · · focus · HN ↗
    It's becoming more clear that for big enterprises to really adopt AI, they need to use open models. Especially if they want to own their own intelligence, which they should.

    I spent the last 2 days building basic AI agents to automate some mundane supply chain workflows for a large company. Those seemingly boring workflows had bank statements, supplier IDs and other sensitive information.

    For me it was all alarm bells, there is no way they can afford to give closed models access to this data. I was compelled to figure out an open model based solution for them, which made me realize that this is probably the only way for enterprises going forward.

    1. tomp · · focus · HN ↗
      I don't get this. It's not like the models are running on their own GPUs.

      So if you're running open models on AWS GPUs, you might as well run Claude (which AWS supports, and doesn't share any data with Anthropic).

      Same with Azure/OpenAI.

      1. schnitzelstoat · · focus · HN ↗
        Sufficiently large enterprises could get their own GPUs to run the models though.
        1. hobofan · · focus · HN ↗
          As long as you don't have "realtime" workloads, owning the GPUs quickly becomes the economical option. The main cost problems is in e.g. chat applications where the workload is spikey, and users expect an near-instant response, for which you need to scale the GPUs to the highest spikes of the workload.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.