‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

The current balance of power in open models

132 points · 58 comments · gmays

  1. Zaraif13 · · focus · HN ↗
    It's becoming more clear that for big enterprises to really adopt AI, they need to use open models. Especially if they want to own their own intelligence, which they should.

    I spent the last 2 days building basic AI agents to automate some mundane supply chain workflows for a large company. Those seemingly boring workflows had bank statements, supplier IDs and other sensitive information.

    For me it was all alarm bells, there is no way they can afford to give closed models access to this data. I was compelled to figure out an open model based solution for them, which made me realize that this is probably the only way for enterprises going forward.

    1. bpodgursky · · focus · HN ↗
      I've actually flipped on this the last few days because of liability.

      The big labs are going to be on the hook for rogue behavior by Claude or Sol. Customers will be able to sue for damages and deflect regulators if their customer data is abused or their agents attack external services.

      If you use a Chinese OSS model and it goes rogue? Yeah good luck with that, your shop is 100% on the hook.

      1. the_sleaze_ · · focus · HN ↗
        > The big labs are going to be on the hook for rogue behavior

        They haven't so far.

        1. donw · · focus · HN ↗
          ... when are large companies on the hook for anything, ever?

          I mean, hypothetically, yes, but class-action lawsuits get settled out-of-court, the lawyers get paid in Ferrari-multiples, the plaintiffs get paid in McDonalds coupons that expire in two weeks.

          Slaps-on-the-wrist are written into the laws; a million-dollar fine is existential for a small company, and likely not even a line-item at Anthropic.

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.