Thread

1. zero_shift · 1790114443 · focus · HN ↗

   Give the fact this project sprung out of nowhere an hour ago, has one commit and no obvious history beyond that - I must ask, was this vibe-coded?

   1. fragmede · 1790114865 · focus · HN ↗

      Obviously they used AI at some point in the project, the question to you is what is your definition of vibe coding and how does it discredit the effort they did put into it?

      1. nxobject · 1790116604 · focus · HN ↗

         One benchmark would be: would someone with a legacy FoxPro LOB app be entrusting their data to this? Or is it just a nice "wow, that's a cool project"?
   2. sm-silversight · 1790114924 · focus · HN ↗

      Probably. The website does look too good though, none of the design cruft ("eyebrows") that LLMs like. But the last design I let it do was from opus 4.7 or gpt 5.3.

      1. Kwpolska · 1790115294 · focus · HN ↗

         It does look very LLM-y to me, the copy certainly is.

         1. sm-silversight · 1790121920 · focus · HN ↗

            Yeah, you're right. The models have just gotten better at design.
   3. silveira · 1790116087 · focus · HN ↗

      The website at least. Just look for the word "not". LLMs love writing things like "it's not ice cream, is pasta", "you get a full dog, not a cat".

      1. kodomomo · 1790117068 · focus · HN ↗

         "Every picture is a real session."

         Dead giveaway.

   4. stuaxo · 1790116338 · focus · HN ↗

      There's a continuum between vibe coded and directed LLM, I guess we'll see which it is.
   5. roywiggins · 1790119199 · focus · HN ↗

      The website is obviously and gratingly LLM-voiced. I don't know how people aren't tired of paragraphs like this yet:

      "Visual FoxPro is a 32-bit program, and that decides more than it appears to. It is why a table stops at two gigabytes, why a memo file stops at two gigabytes, and why a big report runs out of memory on a machine with plenty to spare. The limits are signed 32-bit numbers buried in the file handling, not a licensing decision anybody made."

      and

      "The editor checks what you type through that very compiler, so what it underlines and what the runtime refuses cannot drift apart."

      Like, what? Who talks like that?

      1. DANmode · 1790128554 · focus · HN ↗

         Robots (by default).

         Take the time to ask for anything else.

      2. ModernMech · 1790163366 · focus · HN ↗

         To me, this is not worse than any Apple marketing page from the last 15 years written by human marketing people.

         1. roywiggins · 1790188447 · focus · HN ↗

            Right, yes, this sort of style certainly can be produced by writers, especially ones who are working in a particular corporate universe. That's where LLMs got it from! It just sucks that everyone "writes" like that now. Every new one-person project or company is incongruously spouting corporatese. Don't we get enough of that already? Flattening everything into American corpo-speak sucks.

            1. ModernMech · 1790189565 · focus · HN ↗

               Okay but why should one expect a marketing site, which this is, to have quality prose instead of typical marketing prose, which it does.
   6. lnx01 · 1790144650 · focus · HN ↗

      The post comment here is 100% packed with LLMisms, so yes.

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.