‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

SAML: A fractal of bad design

353 points · 190 comments · aray07

  1. ocdtrekkie · · focus · HN ↗
    Eh, if you don't have SAML support, I can find a product that does. Not a problem. \o/

    (Or to be more clear, it is mostly unacceptable for an enterprise product to have opinionated decisions about what authentication it works with. You either work with what we use or you are not viable as a product for our need. It's kinda simple. I would expect someone whose authentication was OIDC-based to be similarly dismissive if you told them you only would do SAML.)

    1. sgarland · · focus · HN ↗
      If a company said "you must support DES," I would expect that their cybersecurity insurance provider would start asking them some questions, and if they became indignant that no one would do so, I would expect them to be publicly mocked.

      There is one valid excuse for why you must have support for an outdated protocol: embedded / air-gapped systems. For anything else, just admit that you don't want to make the change. That's a business decision, nothing else.

      1. ocdtrekkie · · focus · HN ↗
        It's outdated in the way that the author doesn't like it, but SAML will probably outlive OIDC.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.