I actually like their implementation.
I'm curious if it will be enough for governments, but it is nice that they are trying to persue a path without id checks
I can imagine a few more. Here's one that is 100% effective:
* Wait until your account was created > 18 years ago.
That may not be enough for you, and that's fine, this is not a governmental service or site, with a mandate to serve everyone. You can chose not to use discord, and discord can choose not to have you as a customer. YMMV.
Foskya · · focus · HN ↗
dsr_ · · focus · HN ↗
- give us your ID
- give us your biometrics
- give somebody, not necessarily Discord, a valid credit card
That's sll of the paths.
secabeen · · focus · HN ↗
* Wait until your account was created > 18 years ago.
That may not be enough for you, and that's fine, this is not a governmental service or site, with a mandate to serve everyone. You can chose not to use discord, and discord can choose not to have you as a customer. YMMV.
Scaled · · focus · HN ↗
<a href="https://www.dexerto.com/entertainment/discord-dev-responds-after-users-report-child-safety-bans-over-grid-images-3383677/" rel="nofollow">https://www.dexerto.com/entertainment/discord-dev-responds-a...
(Not everyone got unbanned for grid posting yet)