‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

GPT-6 Sol and Luna

1779 points · 855 comments · OfficialTurkey

  1. m_fayer · · focus · HN ↗
    I've been working with agents all year, but 5.6 Sol was some sort of sweet spot for me. Something about how it communicated verbally and its engineering instincts just clicked for me, and I was able to somehow predict it and jam with it. Like a colleague you click with. It's the first model I've gotten attached to. I'm concerned that whatever model supercedes it, while technically better, just won't feel quite as natural to work with. And this makes me feel very professionally vulnerable to the labs. I miss the days when my crucial tooling came from companies as reliable and predictable as, say, Jetbrains.
    1. sinsterizme · · focus · HN ↗
      Agreed! I found it excellent: - Relatively fast (especially compared to Opus 5) - Non-verbose prose, both in interaction and as code comments - Good code quality

      Like you said, it felt very natural to work with. Opus 5 is way too slow and verbose for me, I find I get distracted and annoyed with it.

      Opus 5.5 seems a LOT closer so far to what I liked about 5.6 Sol but we'll see

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.