‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Aging may be a program, not a breakdown

83 points · 88 comments · elo2000

  1. anonporridge · · focus · HN ↗
    It's probably a bit of both.

    Maintaining order and fighting entropy is hard, but also planned obsolescence is a good thing for systemic resilience.

    You have to regularly clear out the old for at least two reasons...

    a) keep the process of creating new things well exercised. "We can't build that anymore. We don't know how." A factory that builds things that last too long eventually goes out of business.

    b) prevent old things from monopolizing resources due to more time to compound interest. Otherwise, you end up with Saturn devouring his son.

    1. fsckboy · · focus · HN ↗
      most of human evolutionary history was hunter gatherer and survival was subsistence level, and your arguments don't work.

      birthing was necessary at least to maintain population, but preferably to expand it. it's only now that we consider "too many" a possibility, and we didn't evolve for this moment.

      our history does not show potentially perpetually compounding gains that our children would evolutionarily need a genetic defense against, we already had looting, stealing, and killing.

      I think the answer, if there is a programmed obsolesence, is because the genetic admixing of the next generation through sexual reproduction is so useful and important.

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.