> Claude Opus 5.5 is our first release since we called for pacing the frontier.
Interesting how the very first line is used to remind the reader of their call to pace the frontier just last week, and everything else after that line is to demonstrate with very specific numbers how they absolutely are not pacing.
Isn't the idea that they claim to be willing to slow down if everyone does (ie governments force everyone to), but otherwise they won't slow down because they still think they'll make the best choices with superintelligence if they get there first? That's my understanding of what all the major labs claim to believe anyway.
sailingparrot · · focus · HN ↗
Interesting how the very first line is used to remind the reader of their call to pace the frontier just last week, and everything else after that line is to demonstrate with very specific numbers how they absolutely are not pacing.
apitman · · focus · HN ↗
SV_BubbleTime · · focus · HN ↗
China is literally only a single step behind and willing to drop free models just to undercut the US companies.
I’m for it because I don’t want another massive Google or Meta.
pyronite · · focus · HN ↗
SV_BubbleTime · · focus · HN ↗
Or, they fail because the current model is massively sustainable? Also oh noes?
zanderwohl · · focus · HN ↗
throwawayk7h · · focus · HN ↗
zanderwohl · · focus · HN ↗
frabcus · · focus · HN ↗
Keep in mind the AIs acted for months without human knowledge, hacked into two major companies (Hugging Face and OpenAI).
This would have blown my mind if explained to me just a few years ago when I thought LLMs would be limited as an architecture.
includenotfound · · focus · HN ↗
What if?
Easy to "what if" on an unfalsifiable claim.