‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Claude Opus 5.5

1806 points · 1134 comments · km144

  1. joshstrange · · focus · HN ↗
    > It performs at the level of Claude Fable 5.1 on most work and costs 40% less to run than Opus 5.

    > Input and output tokens are $4 and $20 per million, 20% less than Opus 5. Cache reads (which make up the majority of agentic and coding work costs) are $0.20 per million tokens, 60% less than Opus 5. Opus 5.5 also generates output more than 30% faster than Opus 5.

    Better than Fable, cheaper than even the last Opus. I use Opus as my main driver so this is very exciting!

    1. bayesianbot · · focus · HN ↗
      Wow those cache reads are quite reasonable - I think that's equal to 5.6 Terra. I might have to try Claude again after years of being priced out of it
    2. bleonard · · focus · HN ↗
      The effect of this is that it is encouraging longer agent threads. All of the previous models across major providers had a 10% cache read cost (vs normal cost) and not this is 5%

      So longer threads get cheaper and one-shots stay the same price.

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.