‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Vacate a drone restriction that criminalized recording immigration agents

96 points · 17 comments · hn_acker

  1. dji4321234 · · focus · HN ↗
    As stated in the article, this restriction was already rescinded (to avoid a lawsuit reaching court) and replaced with an advisory stating that drones near DHS vehicles might be taken down:

    <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.rcfp.org&#x2F;wp-content&#x2F;uploads&#x2F;2026&#x2F;04&#x2F;FAA-drone-advisory.pdf" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.rcfp.org&#x2F;wp-content&#x2F;uploads&#x2F;2026&#x2F;04&#x2F;FAA-drone-ad...

    The effort from the EFF is to get the original restriction called back up and vacated - essentially, they want a post-hoc determination that it was illegal, but the restriction is already gone.

    1. fitblipper · · focus · HN ↗
      That just means the restriction can be used again in the future. All they have to do is recind it faster than the courts work and then it&#x27;ll always be a tool in their toolbox regardless of the legality of it.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.