‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

OpenAI is well positioned to fast-follow Jev

328 points · 233 comments · JohnBerryman

  1. orbital-decay · · focus · HN ↗
    Every major AI shop has a ton of in-house classifiers already, big, small, generalist, specialized. Some are used in inference pipelines (e.g. safeguards), some are used in data preparation, training, analysis and investigation, research, various one-off and intermediate tasks etc. Offering them on a public API doesn't always make business sense. I don't see much substance to this buzz, looks like people that are new to all this are discovering that classifiers exist, they are more efficient at classification, and many tasks commonly done with generative models are classification in disguise. Which is not bad at all, a fresh look at their use is great to have.
    1. bigmadshoe · · focus · HN ↗
      Correct me if I'm wrong, but a zero-shot classifier like Jev is fundamentally different to a classifier with a fixed task (e.g. for safeguards), unless they trained a general purpose system to complete the safeguard task, which seems unlikely.
      1. BiteCode_dev · · focus · HN ↗
        The generalist aspect of jev is what is good about it. Old classifiers tended to be specialized, not good at ambiquity or limited.

        LLM were used as classifiers because they solved that.

        Jev have the flexibility of LLM and the perf and api of classifiers.

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.