Thread

1. wand3r · 1790086615 · focus · HN ↗

   Really seems like they used it to anonymize the students, but that is a lot less polarizing. Does it matter if they swapped the race? They also swapped all identifying facial features of anyone in the picture. That might have even been the prompt they used in the first place.

   I am not a big fan of gen ai, but freak outs about nothingness detract from the real issues. I would be more concerned if they swapped the 3 students into a background or setting they were never in, than use the public setting and swap out the students for ai models.

   Edit: please stop saying I didn't read the article. The article is almost exclusively opinion based on the observers reaction. "Slimmed down" is what I an saying is anonymized. As I also said, they put letting on top, so it is a tiny tile in a much larger piece. No problem if people don't agree, but the contention the article gives a lot of info and supporting claims is not true. We only really learn Stanford took the photo from the article, the rest of the conclusions are drawn from the 2 pics

   1. bpodgursky · 1790086714 · focus · HN ↗

      Only a bot who can't parse images would reply with this. Look at the pictures, your thesis is totally wrong.

      1. wand3r · 1790087825 · focus · HN ↗

         I am not a bot.

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.