‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

I said no and Apple said yes

886 points · 701 comments · thatslast

  1. vitro · · focus · HN ↗
    Not trying to start flamewars, but more and more I wonder how much are people willing to put up with such practices. On linux for 15+ years and everytime I try to use mac or win, it is an ordeal. And ads. F*cking ads in a system someone has purchased. And spying. Really user hostile environment. No, thank you.
    1. steve_taylor · · focus · HN ↗
      Linux distros would never do something as egregious as, let's say, unturnoffable app updates, would they?
      1. zeta0134 · · focus · HN ↗
        Depends on the distro really. Linux (the kernel) doesn't have or require such a concept, but it's quite possible to build a linux-based system whose surrounding operating system is designed to work this way. My Meta Quest 3 is one such example. Linux kernel, but Horizon OS only allows updates to be postponed. It'll automatically install them and in one case soft-bricked itself, forcing me to recover manually. (Great job, Meta.)

        This flexibility makes it difficult to make broad sweeping statements about the thing. Certainly however, it's impressive to log into a linux server and see an uptime measured in years. (Impressively horrifying, depending on your security posture, but impressive nonetheless.)

        1. steve_taylor · · focus · HN ↗
          I was referring to Ubuntu's Snap.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.