I was curious to see how this would work with bzip2 and zstd. The source is public at <a href="https://github.com/nathanrs/gzipt" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/nathanrs/gzipt, and I asked MiMo-V2.6-Flash to fork and modify it in a straightforward way. The answer is that bzip2 produces sequences that don't resemble human language:
Line breaks added. This looks roughly optimized for the most repetitive Burrows-Wheeler transform (<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burrows%E2%80%93Wheeler_transform" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burrows%E2%80%93Wheeler_transf...). Why are they runs of alternating symbols and not one symbol?
Zstandard produces whitespace with the occasional letter thrown in. To quote MiMo: "As you can see, zstd does not speak Shakespeare. ... zstd encodes a run of one repeated byte as a near-free run-length sequence, and space and newline are the cheapest literals in the corpus: ten newlines cost about the same to append ten bytes of genuine corpus text and less than nonsense does."
So, you had an AI write code you don't understand, then posted output you don't understand in a comment on the internet for other humans to read?
Then why attribute the work to MiMo? People mostly only attribute the model when they've outsourced the understanding along with the coding. If I understand the code I don't bother to mention the tools I used to create it.
networked · · focus · HN ↗
Zstandard produces whitespace with the occasional letter thrown in. To quote MiMo: "As you can see, zstd does not speak Shakespeare. ... zstd encodes a run of one repeated byte as a near-free run-length sequence, and space and newline are the cheapest literals in the corpus: ten newlines cost about the same to append ten bytes of genuine corpus text and less than nonsense does."
jeremyjh · · focus · HN ↗
[deleted] · · focus · HN ↗
[deleted]
[deleted] · · focus · HN ↗
[deleted]
Dylan16807 · · focus · HN ↗
jeremyjh · · focus · HN ↗