‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

MiMo-v2.6-Pro: Intelligence, Performance and Price Analysis

166 points · 68 comments · theanonymousone

  1. egeres · · focus · HN ↗
    It feels suspicious that MiMo-V2.6 Pro gets 46 in de index while DeepSeek-V4.1 (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;artificialanalysis.ai&#x2F;models&#x2F;deepseek-v4-1-flash" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;artificialanalysis.ai&#x2F;models&#x2F;deepseek-v4-1-flash) gets 39. According to the appendix at the bottom of <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;mimo.xiaomi.com&#x2F;mimo-v2-6" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;mimo.xiaomi.com&#x2F;mimo-v2-6 the deepseek model sometimes surpasses mimo and it&#x27;s not so far behind in capabilities. A week ago opus 5 appeared 1 points ahead of fable 5 despite fable being a much smarter model (this has been corrected already)
    1. conception · · focus · HN ↗
      DS 4.1 is good but it’s clearly not as “smart” as non-flash models- it just doesn’t have the training data. Without a solid plan, it goes off the rails pretty regularly.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.