Thread

MiMo-v2.6-Pro: Intelligence, Performance and Price Analysis

166 points · 68 comments · theanonymousone

egeres · 1790062027 · focus · HN ↗
It feels suspicious that MiMo-V2.6 Pro gets 46 in de index while DeepSeek-V4.1 (<a href="https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/deepseek-v4-1-flash" rel="nofollow">https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/deepseek-v4-1-flash) gets 39. According to the appendix at the bottom of <a href="https://mimo.xiaomi.com/mimo-v2-6" rel="nofollow">https://mimo.xiaomi.com/mimo-v2-6 the deepseek model sometimes surpasses mimo and it's not so far behind in capabilities. A week ago opus 5 appeared 1 points ahead of fable 5 despite fable being a much smarter model (this has been corrected already)
1. SyneRyder · 1790068634 · focus · HN ↗
  The main AA benchmark keeps changing, and had to be radically changed when Astra came out and showed zero improvement over GPT 5.6 Sol in their benchmark. Opus 5 is still 1 point ahead of Fable 5.0 on the index, if you manually add Fable 5.0 back into the list, so it hasn't actually been "corrected". It's only Fable 5.1 that is shown as ahead of Opus 5.
  The AA benchmark is a weighted average of other benchmarks and some internal ones. I think the difficult part is finding benchmarks that reflect your own use of the models.
  1. yt1998 · 1790079760 · focus · HN ↗
    [dead]

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.