Thread

1. egeres · 1790062027 · focus · HN ↗

   It feels suspicious that MiMo-V2.6 Pro gets 46 in de index while DeepSeek-V4.1 (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;artificialanalysis.ai&#x2F;models&#x2F;deepseek-v4-1-flash" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;artificialanalysis.ai&#x2F;models&#x2F;deepseek-v4-1-flash) gets 39. According to the appendix at the bottom of <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;mimo.xiaomi.com&#x2F;mimo-v2-6" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;mimo.xiaomi.com&#x2F;mimo-v2-6 the deepseek model sometimes surpasses mimo and it&#x27;s not so far behind in capabilities. A week ago opus 5 appeared 1 points ahead of fable 5 despite fable being a much smarter model (this has been corrected already)

   1. GodelNumbering · 1790067952 · focus · HN ↗

      &gt; It feels suspicious that MiMo-V2.6 Pro gets 46 in de index while DeepSeek-V4.1 gets 39.

      Why?

      1. big-chungus4 · 1790078636 · focus · HN ↗

         &gt; W

         W what?

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.