Thread

1. nbf_1995 · 1790086541 · focus · HN ↗

   It seems like it would be more effective to simply put all the solar panels in a field, and construct a cheap shade over the entire canal no? The supports in the picture are massive and don't look cheap. Also I would imagine the solar array uses more copper than a similar capacity array just built in a field. You can't daisy chain multiple miles of solar panels together, so you need an extra power line to run alongside the whole thing.

   Put the solar panels in a field: The solar array uses less copper. The shade supports don't have to hold up solar panels: Shade supports cost less.

   The best reasoning they give is that California has insane permitting requirements, and it takes 1/6 the time to build on developed land compared to undeveloped land.

   1. ch4s3 · 1790109461 · focus · HN ↗

      Or better yet, invest in pipes.

      1. imoverclocked · 1790109564 · focus · HN ↗

         Canal sized pipes?

         1. jyounker · 1790181236 · focus · HN ↗

            400+ miles of 20m tunnels. How much cheaper is that going to be?

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.