What California is learning from solar panels built over irrigation canals
Thread
Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.
What California is learning from solar panels built over irrigation canals
Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.
nbf_1995 · · focus · HN ↗
Put the solar panels in a field: The solar array uses less copper. The shade supports don't have to hold up solar panels: Shade supports cost less.
The best reasoning they give is that California has insane permitting requirements, and it takes 1/6 the time to build on developed land compared to undeveloped land.
schnevets · · focus · HN ↗
Nothing short of a face-to-face security response will deter these criminals, so there it is a challenging cost-benefit balance. At least panels in parking lots and other developed spaces have the benefit of witnesses. I'm sure a 20 foot climb up a steel beam over running water is a decent deterrent as well.
amluto · · focus · HN ↗
The major downsides are that the exposed wire is much less corrosion resistant underground (which is irrelevant) and that you need appropriate lugs. But standard lugs can easily be purchased in aluminum-compatible variants at no additional cost.
imp0cat · · focus · HN ↗
convolvatron · · focus · HN ↗