‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

I don't want to read what you didn't write

1070 points · 460 comments · mooreds

  1. hatthew · · focus · HN ↗
    As I have been saying for years:

    Writing is fundamentally the transfer of information from your brain to my brain. If you have 1000 bits of semantic information you want to transfer, you can't give 300 bits of semantic information to an LLM and have it fill in the remaining 700, because it doesn't know what those 700 bits are. If it's able to guess those 700 bits correctly, then they aren't true semantic information, and you really only have 300 bits you want to transfer. You might as well transfer those bits to me directly, rather than having the LLM add on an extra superfluous 700 bits that I then have to filter out.

    1. ponector · · focus · HN ↗
      I have 300 bits of information in rude direct form with some obscene language as well. I ask LLM to wrap it into a nice polite message. Resulted 1000 bits are sent in the email.

      I bet no one would like to get direct rude "source" instead.

      1. latexr · · focus · HN ↗
        > I bet no one would like to get direct rude "source" instead.

        You bet wrongly. Rudeness carries information.

        “Fucking hell, how many times have I asked you to XYZ” is different from “G’day gov’nor, terribly sorry to bother you. May I remind you to XYZ? Would you mind doing so at your earliest convenience? My deepest regards, toodeloo”.

        The former conveys urgency and annoyance while the former conveys that you can keep ignoring it (and straining the relationship).

        1. zzril · · focus · HN ↗
          The latter one conveys urgency in the sense it burns more tokens on the governor's side.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.