I appreciate the direction of this article, and commend the author on publishing work, but the first sentence in the first paragraph is exactly what they lament.
> A pattern I see is that people use AI to build something new, then they use AI to retrospectively summarize what they have already built into a design document. Reading a document like this isn’t just difficult—it is punishing.
FWIW Pangram [0] "We believe that this entire text is human-written."
I've only just discovered pangram, but I've seen it referred to a few times in HN recently wit nothing obviously pejorative about it. Take it with all required grains of salt, though
blandcoffee · · focus · HN ↗
> A pattern I see is that people use AI to build something new, then they use AI to retrospectively summarize what they have already built into a design document. Reading a document like this isn’t just difficult—it is punishing.
niccl · · focus · HN ↗
I've only just discovered pangram, but I've seen it referred to a few times in HN recently wit nothing obviously pejorative about it. Take it with all required grains of salt, though
0: <a href="https://www.pangram.com/dashboard" rel="nofollow">https://www.pangram.com/dashboard
breezybottom · · focus · HN ↗
pastel8739 · · focus · HN ↗